Posts Tagged ‘button’
Although each culture has its own idea of what is erotic and beautiful, in the United States and other western countries, as well as many other parts of the world, a woman’s breasts are undoubtedly her most prized physical asset. One need only to turn on a television, go to the movies or flip open a magazine for proof that cleavage and breasts reign supreme in America, Europe and most of Asia.
Unfortunately, a very large number of women are dissatisfied with the size and shape of their breasts. This can be extremely frustrating, particularly because the shape of the breasts can be difficult to alter.
If a woman is unhappy with her legs, she can exercise and change her diet. If she is unhappy with her breasts however, she may feel that her options for changing them are out of her control. However, that is not true – today’s women are in a position to take control and enhance both the size and the shape of their breasts.
There are basically two effective options available to women today for enlargement and enhancement of their breasts:
1. Breast Augmentation Surgery
2. Natural, Herbal Breast Enhancement Pills
Other methods, such as massaging with creams or gels and exercises, are not really effective and do not produce significant results by way of enhancement of the breasts.
Breast Enhancement through Surgery
When people think of breast enlargement today, they most often think of surgery. In the 1950s, they may have thought of exercise or push-up bras. In centuries past, they may have thought of herbs like fenugreek and hops flower when thinking of breast enhancement. Today, most women think of implants.
The most common implants these days, of course, are filled with saline. Years ago, implants were usually filled with silicone. Silicone is now considered by most doctors and patients to be too dangerous to use. If a saline implant bursts or leaks, the salt water will be absorbed into the body without great harm.
There are four different surgical options for inserting breast implants:
1. They can be inserted through incisions in the creases underneath the breasts.
2. They can be inserted through the skin in an incision made around the nipple.
3. The surgeon makes an incision near the armpits, and inserts the implants through that.
4. The newest and most expensive technique is endoscopic surgery. In this procedure, an endoscope enables the doctor to insert the implants through a tiny incision in the woman’s belly button. That breast implants can be inserted through a woman’s navel is amazing, but true.
Problems with Breast Enlargement Surgery
Despite the widespread prevalence of surgery as a means for breast enhancement, there is no denying that the results are often less than satisfactory. Not only do implants frequently leak, necessitating further surgery, but they often just don’t look very good. Capsular contracture frequently sets in, squeezing the implant and resulting in a hard, fake-looking breast.
After breast enhancement surgery, some women experience loss of sensation in the nipple and breast areas. Loss of sensation results from damage to nerve endings in the breast and nipple. This loss of sensation may be temporary, but it can also be permanent. The surgical technique used plays a role in this factor.
Another disadvantage of breast augmentation surgery are the very high costs, together with the potential risks of any form of surgery.
Alternative Methods of Breast Enhancement – Natural Herbal Pills
Herbal breast enlargement options are now becoming more widely available, as women seek alternatives to surgery. A variety of natural breast development products can be found on the market, including pills, powder supplements, and creams.
The popular herbal breast enlargement solutions are mostly in pill form, making them both portable and easy to ingest. Women who have tried natural breast enhancements have reported that their breast size has increased by up to two full cup sizes. Although initially met with skepticism, these pills are actually producing some excellent breast enlargement results in women. There is a reason for their increasing in popularity and recognition – they work, and they work well on most women.
The reality is that there thousands of women out there who have successfully enlarged their breasts anywhere from half to two cup sizes (and even more in some cases), by using a breast enhancement pill.
Modern Breast Enlargement Pills
Today’s breast enhancement pills use sound science, along with some ancient ingredients, to help enlarge and enhance women’s breasts naturally, without side effects. They are much less expensive than surgery, as well as being much safer.
These pills are usually made of non-hormonal plant estrogen, or phytoestrogen. The phytoestrogen activates the prostaglandins in the woman’s breasts. Prostaglandins, first discovered in the 1930s by Swedish scientist Ulf von Euler, regulate and communicate with glands. The phytoestrogens encourage breast gland growth, similar to the growth which naturally occurs during puberty.
Herbal breast enhancement can really be an excellent natural, non-surgical option for women desiring breast enlargement. Not only that, the pills can help put some extra padding on women who currently do have implants, to create a more natural look, feel and contour.
If you are one of the several thousands of women worldwide who are unhappy about the size and/or shape of their breasts, today you have a real non-surgical option available – Breast Actives by Breast Gain Plus
Michelle Rodrigues has been researching for the last 5 years. For information and details about , please visit
Public opinion and recent scientific studies have once again swung the pendulum in favor of breast implants in the United States. After the FDA restricted the use of silicone implants in 1992, plastic surgeons experienced a precipitous drop in the number of breast augmentations they performed. The government’s concern at the time were reports that silicone implants were causing generalized symptoms in some women (Rheumatoid arthritis, lupus and other auto immune diseases).
In the years that followed multiple large studies were performed at leading medical centers yielding consistently favorable data. In 1997, the Institute of Medicine independently reviewed this data for the US Congress and found conclusively that there was no evidence that silicone implants were responsible for any major diseases of the body and that these devices did not increase the risk of primary or recurrent breast cancer. Since then, many other studies have solidified these conclusions reassuring the public that silicone and saline implants are indeed safe.
With this increased confidence in implant technology, more women chose to have breast enhancement in the year 2004 than ever before. In fact, the American Society of Plastic Surgeons reported that 254,140 American women underwent the procedure in 2003 compared to 32,607 in 1992. This number continues to rise steadily and Charlotte is no exception. Breast Augmentation has become one of the most commonly performed cosmetic procedures in the US.
Improving breast contours and unevenness may seem trivial and vain at the surface, but the emotional implications are far reaching. The boost in self-confidence that we witness in our patients makes this procedure extremely rewarding. A significant number feel a lack of femininity and have an altered body image similar to our mastectomy patients before their reconstruction. Those that are severely underdeveloped avoid bathing suits and instead wear bulky t-shirts to obscure their flat chests.
Their gratitude after the surgery is unparalleled and they invariably become an important source of referrals to our growing practice. These days, once women have decided to undergo augmentation they are faced with a plethora of options: silicone vs. saline, round shape vs. contoured, smooth surface vs. textured, pre-filled vs. inflatable, under the chest muscle vs. over, in the hospital vs. the office, sedation vs. general anesthesia; not to mention the different size implants and manufacturers available, as well as which incision to use and whether or not other procedures are required. It can become overwhelming?
First, the issue of silicone vs. saline implants. Although the Institute of Medicine unequivocally ruled out the association between silicone gel implants and systemic diseases, local problems with the breasts such as silicone leaking and hardening, while not life-threatening, were concerning to this committee. My personal preference is to use saline implants. These can and do eventually deflate but the salt water used to fill them is completely harmless to the body and gets reabsorbed, making them safer than silicone implants.
Furthermore, unlike saline deflations where the patient soon notices a decrease in size and seeks attention, the ruptured silicone implant can go undetected for years until the breast starts hardening and becomes painful.
The next choice to be considered is smooth vs. textured (rough) surface. My bias has changed in the last decade from mostly textured to mostly smooth implants. Research in the early 90′s indicated that textured silicone implants hardened less frequently than smooth ones. It may not be the case for saline implants however. Some studies show a small difference, others no difference.
When it comes to choosing pre-filled (fixed volume set by the manufacturer) or inflatable implants (inserted empty into the breast and then inflated in-situ), I prefer the latter. Using an inflatable prosthesis allows fur a much smaller incision to be made and more flexibility in choosing the final size, especially when the breasts are uneven to begin with.
Placing the implant behind the chest muscle (pectoralis major) or in front is another intensely debated issue. More surgeons, as I do, feel strongly that behind the muscle is better. The major advantages is a lower rate of hardening, better preservation of nipple sensation, improved breast contour (the edges of the implant are obscured by the muscle) and improved visualization on mammogram.
The disadvantages are that there is more pain after the surgery, the breasts look fuller at the top the first month and the implants occasionally “bounce” when the chest muscle is contracted forcefully (as in some body builders). Despite these inconveniences, behind the muscle is definitely the way to go.
Which incision to use for placing the implant, by contrast, is much less important. Excellent results can be obtained with all four approaches: under the fold, in a crease of the armpit, through the areola (nipple) or the belly button. I generally prefer the armpit crease incision as it is a more direct route behind the muscle and leaves no scar on the breast itself Nipple sensation and breast feeding potential remains intact.
The two dominant manufacturers of implants in the US, McGhan and Mentor, are equivalent in most respects. As to the size of the implant, the majority of our patients are conservative: wanting simply to restore fullness after having children or slightly enhancing underdeveloped breasts. The width of the chest, how much breast tissue exists, and what the target cup size is desired, are the major factors in choosing the volume in “cc’s” of the implant.
The aesthetic “norm” in the US appears to be a full “c” cup unlike Europe and South America where B/small C is more common. Although not an exact science, the majority of patients are content with their final volume. In our one year post-op survey that patients fill out, 91% of women are happy with their size. 6% would have liked to have gone bigger, and 3% smaller.
Be knowledgeable about the complications that can arise. No surgery is without risks. but these should be minimal.
Finally, take your time to do the research. Don’t rush into the surgery. Know that it is safe and ever-more popular, but do it for the right reasons: mainly to feel better about yourself.
Adrien Brody is a business writer specializing in health and beauty products and has written authoritative articles on the industry. To learn more about breast enhancement, make sure you visit
Breast Implant Surgery through the Belly Button
Posted by: admin
January 24th, 2010 >> Herbal Breast Enhancement
Breast implant surgery through the belly button is one of the most exciting developments since the original breast augmentation procedure. This surgical technique allows patients to circumvent the most common patient complaint, which is surely the possibility of postoperative scarring common to every other kind of implant placement surgery. Undergoing breast enlargement using a naval incision does have its drawbacks and limitations, but offers patients an alternative approach which is sure to satisfy many of their concerns about the augmentation process.
The technical medical name for this operation is transumbilical breast augmentation, often abbreviated TUBA. The procedure utilizes a small, completely hidden incision inside the natural folds of the belly button to gain entry to the breast tissue for implant placement. There are no visible incisions made anywhere in the anatomy and there will be no definitive evidence that augmentation has ever occurred. This procedure is unique in these aspects, as all other types of breast implant placement do use external and often noticeable incisions in one of 3 common locations. Before detailing the TUBA approach, let’s look at the more common alternatives…
Periareolar breast augmentation is the most common in the USA and in many other areas of the world. This approach uses small semi-circular incisions in the bottom of the areola to place the implant directly into the breast. This technique can be used with saline or silicone implants, although silicone will require a much longer incision and will not work well for every patient, especially those with diminutive or light colored areolae. Scarring is often visible on the lower portion of the areola and can be extremely disconcerting if the scars are prominent. Additionally, being that this technique cuts into the actual breast mound, there is increased risk for complications including nipple sensitivity issues, breastfeeding issues and infection.
Inframammary breast augmentation is very common and is performed using a crescent shaped incision placed in the breast fold, under the breast mound. This inframammary crease is located exactly where the mammary attaches to the body, under the bulk of the breast. This is the original approach to augmentation and can be used with any type of implant prosthetic. Risk of infection and breastfeeding difficulties are decreased using this approach, as is the chance for diminished nipple sensation. However, this technique also has a serious downside. First, the scars are usually the worst with this method of placing implants and will be easily noticed when looking at the underside of the breast. Worse still is the fact that cutting into the breast fold accelerates the natural degenerative processes which cause ptosis (sagging) of the breast mound. This can cause early overall breast degeneration or can result in various implant based complications including double bubble, or more commonly, bottoming out of the prosthetic.
The transaxillary breast augmentation technique was revolutionary in that it was the first approach to successfully place implants using incisions off the breast mound. This method enters the body through a fine incision in the underarm. The incision can be hidden in a natural fold, although it is still often visible years later when the axilla is exposed. This operative procedure also allows patients to reduce the chance of experiencing complications relating to breastfeeding and nipple sensitivity. The transaxillary technique does not have degenerative effects on the breast fold or other mammary tissues. This surgery can be performed using any type of implant, although it works best with saline or smaller sized silicone prostheses. The downside is the possibility of nerve damage or injury to the lymph nodes in the underarm region and a greater chance for implant migration away from the intended site of placement. Of course, the scarring is also a consideration for many women, especially dancers, models and those who often lift their arms, exposing the incision locations.
Finally, we get to TUBA. The transumbilical approach allows women to reduce all the chances for breastfeeding and sensation complications, as well as avoid damaging the breast structure or enacting noticeable scarring. However, the potential downside of the procedure is that is can currently only be utilized with saline breast implants. Additionally, the technique is not indicated in all women, since individual anatomical concerns may preclude some women as ideal candidates. However, these events are rare and most women will truly benefit from this option when considering surgical breast enlargement.
In conclusion, the transumbilical approach to breast implant placement gives women one more choice to achieve the look and feel they desire without risking many of the usual negative possibilities which are associated with more traditional prosthetic placement. I always recommend that women seek out a specialist in the TUBA technique, since there is simply no substitute for a trained hand and an experienced eye…
Eve Anderson, RN, CSW, is an expert cosmetic surgery nurse and a practicing social worker in the field of mind/body medicine. Additional information about and can be found on her website, Breast-Plastic-Surgery.Org. Article Source:
